Jordan Thompson vs Jason Jung Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Thompson vs J. Jung

Jordan Thompson

AUS

1

Win

Played

3

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

108

C. Rank

856

Best Rank

114

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$4.4M

Career Money

$350.6K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Jason Jung

TPE

1

Win

Played

3

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

108

C. Rank

856

Best Rank

114

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$4.4M

Career Money

$350.6K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Thompson 1 - 3 Jung

They have played 8 sets in total, with Jordan Thompson winning 2 and Jason Jung winning 6. The last match between Jason Jung and Jordan Thompson was at the Nanchang Challenger, 16-09-2016, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Jason Jung getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Thompson	1
Jung	3

Last 4 H2H Matches:

(QF) Nanchang Challenger(09-16-16)

Stats

Jason Jung

Jordan Thompson

(SF) Shanghai Challenger(09-10-16)

Stats

Jason Jung

Jordan Thompson

(QF) Nanjing Challenger(04-22-16)

Stats

Jordan Thompson

Jason Jung

J. Thompson vs J. Jung H2H Profile

J. Thompson	Stats	J. Jung
$4,420,825	Career Prize Money	$350,585
59.50% (479-326)	Career Total W/L	55.35% (414-334)
1	Clay	0
0	Hard	2
0	Indoor	1
17	Titles	8
1	Total H2H Matches	3
44.83% (13-16)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Thompson vs J. Jung Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jordan Thompson has won 49.30% of points on their second serve, while Jason Jung has won 46.12%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jordan Thompson, in recent form, has won 43.52% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jason Jung has won 48.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.66% and 28.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jordan Thompson has saved 62.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jason Jung has saved 52.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jordan Thompson has won 47.06% of matches played (W/L 16/18), with Jason Jung winning 22.22% (W/L 2/7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jordan Thompson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 44/24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 88/67). Jason Jung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 308/223), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 20/26).
Player level: In the last year, Jordan Thompson has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 5/5), where as Jason Jung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 22.22% of matches (W/L 2/7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Jordan Thompson winning 1 times and Jason Jung being victorious 3 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Jordan Thompson winning 2 and Jason Jung winning 6.
The last match between Jordan Thompson and Jason Jung was at the Nanchang Challenger, 16-09-2016, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Jason Jung getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:35:54.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jordan Thompson has played against opponents with an average rank of 101.32 while Jason Jung has played against players with an average rank of 330.33.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jordan Thompson has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jason Jung has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jordan Thompson has converted 15.93% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jason Jung has converted 41.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jordan Thompson vs Jason Jung Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Thompson vs J. Jung H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Thompson	Stats	J. Jung
1	H2H Matches Won	3
2	Sets Won	6
36	Games Won	45
25	Aces (Total)	13
6	Total Double Faults	4
1:35:54	Average Match Time	1:35:54
59% (157/266)	1st Serve %	61% (143/234)
72% (113/157)	1st Serve Win %	78% (112/143)
55% (60/109)	2nd Serve Win %	65% (59/91)
13% (2/16)	Break Pts Won %	27% (6/22)
27% (63/234)	Return Points Win %	35% (93/266)
25% (1/4)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	75% (3/4)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (3/3)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/3)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Thompson Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Sioux Falls Challenger - 20-10-2025
QF Mats RosenkranzM. Rosenkranz	L	7-5 1-0 ret.	Stats
R2 Erik ArutiunianE. Arutiunian	W	7-5 7-6(2)	Stats
R1 Michael MmohM. Mmoh	W	6-3 6-4	Stats
Roanne Challenger - 06-10-2025
R2 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	5-2 ret.	Stats
R1 Dan AddedD. Added	W	6-3 6-1	Stats

View All

J. Jung Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Kobe Challenger - 10-11-2025
R1 Yoshihito NishiokaY. Nishioka	L	1-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
R2 Yoshihito NishiokaY. Nishioka	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
R1 Arthur WeberA. Weber	W	6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(6)	Stats
Suzhou Challenger - 20-10-2025
R1 James McCabeJ. McCabe	L	6-7(4) 6-4 6-2	Stats
Shenzhen Challenger - 13-10-2025
R2 Kaichi UchidaK. Uchida	L	6-3 2-0 ret.	Stats

View All

J. Thompson vs J. Jung Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Thompson	Stats	J. Jung
59.50% (479/326)	YTD Win/Loss	55.35% (414/334)
56.52% (1109/853)	Sets Win/Loss	54.67% (949/787)
52.55% (9889/8930)	Games Win/Loss	51.99% (8605/7946)
60.00% (270/180)	Hard Win/Loss	58.00% (308/223)
56.77% (88/67)	Clay Win/Loss	49.21% (31/32)
63.29% (50/29)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.93% (55/53)
58.68% (71/50)	Grass Win/Loss	43.48% (20/26)
0.43	Aces Per Game	0.24
3989	Aces Total	1949
0.14	Double Faults Per Game	0.2
1293	Total Double Faults	1621
1:31:33	Average Match Time	1:12:48
468.48	Average Opponent Rank	565.62
62% (31339/50429)	1st Serve %	63% (25533/40298)
72% (22457/31339)	1st Serve Win %	68% (17485/25533)
52% (9859/19089)	2nd Serve Win %	51% (7548/14765)
40% (1865/4671)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (1594/3943)
38% (19444/51280)	Return Points Win %	39% (16005/40933)
39.44% (28/43)	Slam W/L	38.89% (14/22)
49.23% (32/33)	Masters W/L	18.18% (2/9)
50.00% (5/5)	Cups W/L	40.00% (2/3)
48.82% (103/108)	Main Tour W/L	46.25% (37/43)
68.00% (221/104)	Challenger W/L	53.93% (240/205)
73.77% (90/32)	Futures W/L	69.59% (119/52)
61% (440/718)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	57% (409/720)
42% (30/72)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	9% (2/22)
54% (164/301)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (122/241)
57% (146/256)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (113/218)
86% (458/393)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (416/352)
14% (458/65)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (416/64)
24% (347/85)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (331/61)